A hot-topic debate in countries throughout the world is over educating the up and coming youth. The United States is known for having some of the best institutions of higher learning, but also for routinely setting the bar low for K-12 education. Many parents have become frustrated by the terrible spending policies in public school systems, yet they cannot afford to send their kids to private schools. A great alternative to both options is a charter school.
Problems with the Current Spending Solutions
One would think that politicians could agree on something so fundamentally important as early childhood and high school education, but there is much disagreement in federal, state, and local politics about where to devote increasingly scarce resources. The current spending model employed by most school districts leaves much to be desired:
The amount of money spent per student is unequal
Unfortunately, students who do not learn as quickly as others do not always get access to the same resources as those who learn faster. The further along kids go in public school often means that such disparities only increase. Charter schools not only have fast-track learning programs, but they also can help students who have had difficulty in the past.
Low-income areas produce less funding
Public schools receive money largely from local taxes. This model may work well for wealthy cities and towns, but when one city must pay for dozens of schools, money can be tight and schools that perform badly may only have access to the funds that are left over. Charter schools are publicly funded but also rely on private funding to operate and be successful, meaning that their source of income is much more stable.
Less spending results in low learning levels
The total amount of money that is spent matters in the long term. Paying for more qualified teachers, especially math and science teachers, and providing comfortable facilities that offer students access to the most modern technologies all help to increase test scores and overall student participation and even teacher retention. Public schools, unlike charter schools, do not always have the resources to pay for the necessary tools and educators.
The Charter System’s Better Use of Funding
While the public school system in America has its benefits, one of its biggest disadvantages is that where students live largely determines the amount of funding their schools receive. For children in affluent neighborhoods and communities, the education system is well supplied and has teachers clamoring for positions. For less wealthy areas, funding is often too little, too late. Charter schools offer another option to families who are dissatisfied with their neighborhood public school. Enrollment in a charter school is non-selective, voluntary, and free. Therefore, if a charter school does not achieve a certain level of success and meet the standards set forth by law, families can choose to leave to attend another school or their charter can even be revoked. The result is an extremely competitive education system when compared to public schools and even some private institutions.
As the world becomes more technologically linked, competition for careers becomes not only a domestic struggle, but an international fight as well. Despite spending more on public education than any other country, the United States frequently lags behind other developed areas of the world in student test scores, especially in math and science. An excellent way for parents to make sure their child acquires the knowledge and skills he or she will need to succeed in college and beyond is to take action and investigate the benefits of attending a charter school like the STEM-focused, college-prep schools managed by the successful Concept Schools charter school system.